ticketkeron.blogg.se

4 core or 6 core mac pro for protools
4 core or 6 core mac pro for protools






  1. #4 CORE OR 6 CORE MAC PRO FOR PROTOOLS PRO#
  2. #4 CORE OR 6 CORE MAC PRO FOR PROTOOLS PC#

Also, MIR since it loads into RAM needs as much as possible, so maxing out there would make sense. I am swinging toward an 8 core 3 GHZ with 1 TB (internal) flash drive for the samples and 64 GB RAM, because that seems to have a balance between speed and multiple processing. If you are editing 4K video, demand everything be done fast, and have multiple displays you need the 12 core. So it becomes a question of how much you need that parallel processing. I was reading in the recent Macworld how the new Mac Pros compared to a loaded Imac and even Macbook Pros are not the fastest on all tasks, but blow everything else away on multiple core tasks. I am trying to figure out a compromise between multiple cores and speed with a slave. (though of course I want it.)įor large orchestras, if you are doing a new performance of Rite of Spring on one computer, you may want a 12 core though. The 12 core is more for extreme video processing and animation rendering, which takes forever unless you have multiple cores.

#4 CORE OR 6 CORE MAC PRO FOR PROTOOLS PRO#

I think that there might be overkill getting the "ultimate" new Mac Pro system for VSL. These three computers run all of VSL very well.

#4 CORE OR 6 CORE MAC PRO FOR PROTOOLS PC#

I recently installed SSDs on three PC slaves and found a huge increase in performance just from that. The great advantages of the new Mac Pro are the "faster-than-SSD" drives, and the multiple cores, as well as Xeon processors.

4 core or 6 core mac pro for protools

‘white paper’ available to aid my purchasing choice? Processing or multiple threaded slower processing? Is there a performance

4 core or 6 core mac pro for protools

Which would be the most efficient and fastest Theģ.7GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon E5 with 10MB 元ģ.5GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5 with 12MB 元 cache I am seriously considering purchasing one of the new MacPro systems (blackĬylinder models) purely for VSL but would like some performance advice.

4 core or 6 core mac pro for protools

Native and AVID OMNI interface and using my retina macbook pro as my VSL slave. I am currently running a MacPro (2012 model) for ProTools 11HD I intend to expand my VSL library but need some performance advice. The fabulous VSL libraries, currently I am running Dimension strings and solo I am relatively new to VSL but cannot fail to see the advantage ofĮnsemble Pro5 and the ability to use a slave to run all my plugins as well as








4 core or 6 core mac pro for protools